Discover why a good CCA reading does not always guarantee a good battery
Ever since Cadillac invented the starter motor in 1912, car mechanics explored ways to measure cold cranking amps. CCA measurements assure that the battery has sufficient power to crank the engine, especially when cold. A starter battery with low resistance promises reasonably good cranking ability, and a CCA reading of 400 to 500A is sufficient for most starter batteries. According to SAE J537, a CCA reading of 500A delivers 500A at -18C (0F) for 30 seconds without dropping below 7.2 volts. [BU-904 How to Measure Capacity].
Courtesy of BMW
A diversity of battery testers have emerged that measure the internal resistance of a starter battery, the gatekeeper that correlates with CCA. These devices are the trusted carbon pile, the pulse-load tester, the non-invasive AC conductance method and the modern electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).
To test the CCA with a carbon pile, a fully charged starter battery is loaded with half the rated CCA for 15 seconds at a moderate temperature of 10º C (50º F) and higher. As example, a 500 CCA battery will discharge at 250A for 15s and the battery passes if the voltage stays above 9.6V. Colder temperatures will cause the voltage to drop further. The carbon pile simulates real-life load condition, detecting defects involving partially shorted cell (low specific gravity) that non-invasive methods might not catch.
Mechanics prefer small sizes and device manufactures have developed handheld testers that induce a momentary high-current pulse. Ohm’s law calculates the internal resistance on hand of the induced voltage drop and provides a CCA-equivalent reading. The test results of this device are similar to those of the carbon pile. The battery should be fully charged and the loads methods can estimate capacity.
The AC conductance method reads CCA by injecting a single frequency of 80–90 Hertz to the battery. These non-invasive units are small, stay cool during the test and the battery does not need to be fully charged. As with the other test methods, AC conductance cannot read capacity.
Critical progress has been made in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). EIS has been in use for many years in laboratories to analyze diverse materials. EIS has been combined with complex modeling to estimate CCA. This also allows capacity estimations. The resulting multi-model electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is called Spectro for short. Spectro™ is a Cadex trademark. (See BU-904: How to Measure Capacity)
Accuracy has always been a question mark and CCA is especially difficult to verify. CCA is affected by state-of-charge (SoC) and and other factors. Figure 1 compares CCA readings taken with AC conductance and Spectro™ at different SoC. Both readings decline with lower SoC and AC conductance is affected more than Spectro™. Since batteries hover at about 70 percent when the car is brought in for service, the CCA readings between the two methods appear similar.
Figure 1: CCA accuracy on state-of-charge
The Spectro CA-12 provides stable CCA readings between a SoC of 100–40% (red); the values on AC Conductance drop rapidly with SoC (blue).
Figure 2 illustrates CCA readings as a function of SoC and battery performance. The CCA of Battery A with a capacity of 100 percent stays steady down to a SoC of 10 percent; Battery B with 37 percent capacity starts to show instabilities at a SoC of about 40 percent, and Battery C with only 22 percent capacity provides uncertain results. This test demonstrates that a health battery provides clear and measurable symptoms where the indicators of a weak battery are muddled.
Figure 2: CCA accuracy in relation to battery condition and SoC
The battery condition governs accuracy. Battery A (100%) is accurate to 10% SoC; Battery B (37%) to 40% SoC. Battery C (22%) delivers unstable results. Test condition: Batteries are discharged at 20A. CCA is measured every 10 min with Spectro™
No single instrument can evaluate all battery anomalies and rapid testing only provides rough estimation. A micro-short in a cell, for example, can only be identified by applying a load after a rest period or checking the specific gravity of the electrolyte. Rapid-testing might pass the battery as good because a charge covers up the anomaly.
All test methods provide outliers and no clear accuracy specifications can be given. Certain defects are easier to detect than others, and as there is a high probability that it will not rain in the Mohave Desert today, forecasting rain in London is more complex. There are no ideal battery test methods and scientists see future in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
Last updated 2015-05-26
Comments are intended for "commenting," an open discussion amongst site visitors. Battery University monitors the comments and understands the importance of expressing perspectives and opinions in a shared forum. However, all communication must be done with the use of appropriate language and the avoidance of spam and discrimination.
If you have a question, require further information, have a suggestion or would like to report an error, use the "contact us" form or email us at: [email protected]. While we make all efforts to answer your questions accurately, we cannot guarantee results. Neither can we take responsibility for any damages or injuries that may result as a consequence of the information provided. Please accept our advice as a free public support rather than an engineering or professional service.