| |
Will the reusable alkaline battery have a future? (BU7)
The reusable alkaline was introduced in 1992 as an alternative to
disposable batteries. The battery was promoted as a low-cost power
source for consumer goods. Attempts were made to open markets for
wireless communications, medical and defense. But the big breakthrough
never came. Today, the reusable alkaline occupies only a small market
and its use is limited to portable entertainment devices and flashlights.
The lack of market appeal is regrettable when considering the environmental
benefit of having to discard fewer batteries. It is said that the
manufacturing cost of the reusable alkaline is only marginally higher
than the primary cell.
The idea of recharging alkaline batteries is not new. Although not
endorsed by manufacturers, ordinary alkaline batteries have been recharged
in households for many years. Recharging these batteries is only effective,
however, if the cells have been discharged to less than 50% of their
total capacity. The number of recharges depends solely on the depth
of discharge and is limited to a few cycles at best. With each recharge,
the amount of capacity the cell can hold is reduced. There is a cautionary
advisory. Charging ordinary alkaline batteries may generate hydrogen
gas, which can lead to explosion. It is not prudent to charge ordinary
alkaline unsupervised.
The reusable alkaline is designed for repeated recharge. Also here,,
there is a loss of charge acceptance with each recharge. The longevity
of the reusable alkaline is a direct function of the depth of discharge;
the deeper the discharge, the fewer cycles the battery can endure.
Tests performed by Cadex on 'AA' reusable alkaline cells showed a
high capacity reading on the first discharge. In fact, the energy
density was similar to that of nickel-metal-hydride. After the battery
was fully discharged and recharged using the manufacturer's charger,
the reusable alkaline settled at 60%, a capacity slightly below that
of nickel-cadmium. Repeat cycling in the same manner resulted in a
fractional capacity loss with each cycle. The discharge current in
the tests was adjusted to 200mA (0.2 C-rate, or one fifth of the rated
capacity); the end-of-discharge threshold was set to 1V/cell.
An additional limitation of the reusable alkaline system is its high
internal resistance, resulting in a load current capability of only
400mA (lower than 400mA provides better results). Although adequate
for portable radios receivers, CD players, tape players and flashlights,
400mA is insufficient to power most mobile phones and video cameras.
The reusable alkaline is inexpensive to buy but the cost per cycle
is high when compared to other rechargeable batteries. Whereas nickel-cadmium
checks in at $0.04US per cycle based on 1500 cycles, the reusable
alkaline costs $0.50 based on 10 full discharge cycles. For many applications,
this seemingly high cost is still economical when compared to primary
alkaline that provides a one-time use. By only partially discharging
the reusable alkaline, an improved cycle life is possible. At 50%
depth of discharge, 50 cycles can be expected.
To compare the operating cost between the standard and reusable alkaline,
a study was done on flashlight batteries for hospital use. The reusable
alkaline achieved measurable cost savings in the low?intensity care
unit in which the flashlights were used only occasionally. The high-intensity
care unit, which used the flashlights constantly, did not attain the
same result. Deeper discharge and more frequent recharge reduced the
service life and offset any cost advantage over the standard alkaline
battery.
When considering reusable alkaline, one must realize that the initial
energy is slightly lower than that of the standard alkaline. Each
subsequent recharge/charge cycle causes the capacity to decrease.
Cost savings are realized if the batteries are never fully discharged
but have a change to be recharged often.
Advantages
- Inexpensive - can be used as a direct replacement for non-rechargeable
(primary) cells.
- More economical than non-rechargeables - allows several
recharges.
- Low self-discharge - can be stored as a standby battery for
up to 10 years.
- Environmentally friendly - no toxic metals used, fewer
batteries are discarded.
- Maintenance free - no need for cycling; no memory.
Limitations
- Limited current handling - suited for light-duty applications like portable
home entertainment, flashlights.
- Limited cycle life - for best results,
recharge before the battery gets too low.
_________________________
Created: March 2003, Last edited: July 2003
About
the Author Isidor Buchmann is the founder and CEO of Cadex Electronics
Inc., in Vancouver BC. Mr. Buchmann has a background in radio communications
and has studied the behavior of rechargeable batteries in practical, everyday
applications for two decades. Award winning author of many articles and books
on batteries, Mr. Buchmann has delivered technical papers around the world.
Cadex Electronics is a manufacturer of advanced battery chargers, battery analyzers
and PC software. For product information please visit www.cadex.com.
Click
here for a printer-friendly version
©
Copyright 2003 - 2005 Isidor Buchmann
| |